The United States International Trade Commission issued a split 3-3 ruling on a petition regarding Chinese tires filed by the United Steel Workers under U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty (AD/CVD) laws. That means that — in all likelihood — the United States will put tariffs or other controls on tires imported from China. Counterintuitively, not one of the nine domestic American tire companies that produce 100 percent of the tires made here supports the AD/CVD petition.
Don Ikenson at Forbes explains the domestic tire producers’ lack of support for the ruling is due to the steel workers union not really being interested in stopping Chinese imports, but rather gaining power to use against their negotiating partners here in the United States.
The United Steel Workers represents about 40 percent of American tire workers. They were the sole petitioner that argued the domestic manufacturers are the victims of unfair trade. The problem with that argument: over the period of investigation, not only were all nine domestic producers profitable, but also that their profit margins increased at a better rate than either those of the automotive industry or the entire manufacturing sector.
The domestic tire industry is healthy. Capacity utilization in the industry during the investigation was right around 90 percent. To meet anticipated demands, three new entrants in the U.S. tire market will be spending $1.75 billion on new tire factories in the United States. Goodyear has announced $500 million in plant expansions — and that’s on top of $2.4 billion the domestic producers have recently invested in capital improvements.
That hardly sounds like an industry that’s suffering from unfair trade.
Part of the health of the domestic tire producers is because they don’t directly compete with Chinese tires. Domestic producers decided a while ago to focus on premium OEM and replacement tires, leaving the budget and economy side of the business to Chinese producers willing to exchange margins for volume. At the same time, eight of the nine domestic producers make their low-cost tires overseas. The controls on imports wouldn’t help the domestics sell the tires they make in the United States and also make it more expensive to import cheaper tires from China.
Jobs wouldn’t be protected in the United States, according to Ikenson. While it might affect Chinese production, the importers would just switch to tires supplied from Indonesia, Mexico or Brazil.
Why, then, would the USW file the petition in the first place? Leverage.
If the trade commission puts measures to fix the supposedly unfair situation in place, they’ll be in effect for five years unless — and this is a very big unless — the petitioners — i.e. the union — are willing to let the “trade remedies” be revoked. Not only does that give the union a bargaining chip when negotiating new domestic contracts, but also by filing the petition the steel workers’ union has managed to wedge itself into having a say in the domestic tire companies’ global production strategies.
(Note: The historical film was made in the 1930s for Brunswick Tires, which was owned by the corporation more famous for its billiard and bowling equipment.)
Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, a realistic perspective on cars & car culture and the original 3D car site. If you found this post worthwhile, you can get a parallax view at Cars In Depth. If the 3D thing freaks you out, don’t worry, all the photo and video players in use at the site have mono options.
The post US Tire Makers Oppose New Restrictions On Chinese Tires – It’s A Union Thing appeared first on The Truth About Cars.
Best Deals today in www.freepromotoday.com
